Metabox Alpha-X NH58AD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMetabox Alpha-X NH58AD  (all builds)
MotherboardIT NH5xAx
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200603
Uptime5 Days
Run DateJul 15 '21 at 13:10
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 74.2
1-Core 139
2-Core 272
87% 162 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 660
73% 577 Pts
64-Core 628
39% 628 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 50F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 462.75
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 107
Parallax 102
84% 104 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 92.4
Splatting 89.4
78% 97 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Metabox Performance 500GB PCIe NVME SSD
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM53.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 71 110 86 67 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 27.7
Write 910
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 91.9
61% 262 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 22.4
58% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 339
231% 287 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 206%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
76.2% Very good
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 30.2
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 29.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 3R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 21% 28 105 5 60 15.5" 1536 864 NCP004B
Typical Alpha-X NH58AD Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

System: Metabox Alpha-X NH58AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback