Gigabyte GA-B560M AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B560M AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '21 at 17:40
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G6405T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 109
2-Core 193
77% 131 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 303
41% 305 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2200
Nvidia(10DE 131B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1746 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 462.59
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
47.9% Average
Lighting 55.2
Reflection 67.8
Parallax 59.2
45% 60.7 fps
MRender 72.8
Gravity 59
Splatting 65.4
54% 65.7 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
280GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1255 1630 1796 1670 436 430 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 2,436
Write 1,982
Mixed 1494
SusWrite 1,203
398% 1,779 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 56.9
181% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 897
DQ Write 618
DQ Mixed 754
564% 756 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 261%
Great: 332%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$70
118GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 272 272 272 274 336 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 263
Mixed 324
SusWrite 294
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 85.4
4K Mixed 50
169% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 227
205% 312 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 106%
Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$70
75GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 275 275 275 274 374 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 271
Mixed 318
SusWrite 312
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 48.9
168% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 232
207% 313 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 107%
Great: 118%
Transcend TS2TSSD220Q 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 441 443 443 440 441 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 411
Mixed 402
SusWrite 440
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 31.2
133% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 50.5
89% 168 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$60
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 28.9
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 39.8
SC Mixed 26.6
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 25% 12 109 7 50 31.5" 1920 1080 MEIC329 Panasonic-TV
Typical GA-B560M AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 3,112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B560M AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback