Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive395% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory17.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 21 '22 at 21:56
Run Duration295 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 42%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$137
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 78.1
1-Core 131
2-Core 255
85% 155 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 862
81% 673 Pts
64-Core 1,345
83% 1,345 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
Gigabyte(1458 4027) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.8% Average
Lighting 54.7
Reflection 55.8
Parallax 56.8
45% 55.8 fps
MRender 62.9
Gravity 49.2
Splatting 45.5
42% 52.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$117
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3130 2607 1714 1707 1697 1702 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
395% Outstanding
Read 2,785
Write 3,234
Mixed 2,874
SusWrite 2,093
620% 2,747 MB/s
4K Read 70.8
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 103
330% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,320
DQ Write 1,042
DQ Mixed 1,149
869% 1,170 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 395%
Great: 477%
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
464GB free
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1959 1964 1963 1961 1933 1852 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
332% Outstanding
Read 2,240
Write 1,570
Mixed 1,578
SusWrite 1,939
411% 1,832 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 66.8
226% 78.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,348
DQ Write 1,076
DQ Mixed 1,191
897% 1,205 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 332%
Great: 332%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
94GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 93 94 93 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 68
Write 64.7
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 92.7
49% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMG32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 35.5
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 33
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,663 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $712
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback