Asrock H87 Performance

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H87 Performance  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130703
Uptime17.9 Days
Run DateJul 30 '17 at 03:15
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 90
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 170
72% 119 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 259
35% 261 Pts
64-Core 267
16% 267 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250
EVGA(3842 1257) 896MB
Ram: 896MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
8.52% Terrible
Lighting 11.7
Reflection 9.08
Parallax 5.03
10% 8.59 fps
MRender 9.57
Gravity 8.9
Splatting 6.43
7% 8.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.52%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
615GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 93.4
Write 95.8
Mixed 90.9
70% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.33
90% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 66%
Seagate ST3200822AS 200GB-$33
181GB free
Firmware: 3.01 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 58.8
Write 58
Mixed 57.1
44% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.37
94% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3-1333 CL9 4GB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.8% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87 Performance Builds (Compare 479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H87 Performance - $141

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback