PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Toshiba SATELLITE U500 (all builds) |
Motherboard | TOSHIBA JPTR |
Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20100128 |
Uptime | 1.4 Days |
Run Date | Jul 30 '17 at 19:25 |
Run Duration | 667 Seconds |
Run User | GRC-User |
Background CPU | 34% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3 M 330
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
|
40.3%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce 310M
Toshiba(1179 FF40) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
|
1.54%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
26.9%
Poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
4GB free, PID a200
|
7.94%
Terrible
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
2GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
4.9%
Terrible
|
|||
WDC WD64 00AAVS-00G9B1 640GB
0GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
12.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair CM3X4GSD1066 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
22.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 M 430IntelBench 39%, 14,318 samples | 12x |
Core i5 M 520Intel $70Bench 40%, 23,644 samples | 3x |
Core2 Duo P8700Intel $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 310MNvidiaBench 1%, 8,303 samples | 16x |
Mobility Radeon HD 4500ATIBench 1%, 9,615 samples | 6x |
GeForce G210MNvidiaBench 1%, 1,370 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 32% - Below average | Total price: $137 |