MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics187% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B93
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201030
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 26 '21 at 18:32
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 80.7
1-Core 128
2-Core 255
85% 155 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 849
81% 670 Pts
64-Core 1,278
79% 1,278 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.7.2
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
187% Outstanding
Lighting 242
Reflection 248
Parallax 519
197% 336 fps
MRender 363
Gravity 197
Splatting 286
230% 282 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 187%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,658
Write 2545
Mixed 1,938
530% 2,380 MB/s
4K Read 68.3
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 93.4
311% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,199
DQ Write 875
DQ Mixed 1,050
781% 1,041 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB
175GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 239 237 237 238 238 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 366
Write 359
Mixed 288
SusWrite 239
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 39.9
134% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 216
157% 207 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 119%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
921GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 145 147 148 145 148 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 150
Write 115
Mixed 92.9
SusWrite 145
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 85%
TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S 2TB
2TB free, PID 0b19
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 134 132 135 130 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 133
Write 134
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 133
159% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 51%
WDC WD64 00AAVS-00G9B1 640GB
245GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 37.4
Write 38.1
Mixed 31
SusWrite 39.8
50% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$118
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
93% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.8
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 38.1
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 93%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93) Builds (Compare 4,574 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $833
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback