Eurocom X5 R2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemEurocom X5 R2  (all builds)
MotherboardEUROCOM X5 R2
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150728
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 22 '21 at 10:55
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 189
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 475
48% 390 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000 with Max-Q Design
Clevo(1558 7481) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1788
Performing below potential (89th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (69 fps cap detected)
56.8% Above average
Lighting 70.1
Reflection 67.9
Parallax 63.5
57% 67.2 fps
MRender 69.8
Gravity 66.6
Splatting 69.2
56% 68.5 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 58%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG8704RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 128 212 227 243 246 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 423
Write 338
Mixed 278
SusWrite 220
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 3.1
36% 8.17 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 61%
Samsung PM830 mSATA 64GB
58GB free
Firmware: CXM13D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 167 168 167 167 167 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 442
Write 171
Mixed 229
SusWrite 167
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 20.7
88% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 59.5
DQ Mixed 95
87% 139 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 62%
WD Red 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$125
476GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 96 96 95 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 112
Write 107
Mixed 59
SusWrite 94.8
68% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair SODIM DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
56.2% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.3
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 17.3" 1280 720 CMO1720
Typical X5 R2 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

System: Eurocom X5 R2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $110
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback