Today's hottest deals

Alienware 17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware 17  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 068R5X
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '18 at 14:54
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 23.5
2-Core 37.1
30% 40.7 Pts
4-Core 66.6
8-Core 104
10% 85.1 Pts
64-Core 87
5% 87 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770M
Dell(1028 05AE) 3GB
CLim: 862 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 381.65
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.81% Terrible
Lighting 9.17
Reflection 8.77
Parallax 11.2
8% 9.73 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 9.13
8% 10.5 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 7.81%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 mSATA 64GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM13D1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 429
Write 167
Mixed 240
61% 279 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 21.2
4K Mixed 7.21
38% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 38.9
DQ Write 42.6
DQ Mixed 24.6
23% 35.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 62%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$64
698GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
63% Good
Read 120
Write 99.9
Mixed 103
81% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 0.63
4K Mixed 0.21
66% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 63%
Great: 71%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$64
698GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 117
Write 118
Mixed 119
89% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 2.39
4K Mixed 0.35
116% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 71%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8
2GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 96.4
Write 9.3
Mixed 18.2
36% 41.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.42
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.02
29% 2.48 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 16.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 17 Builds (Compare 1,180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware 17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback