Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF  (all builds)
Memory73.9 GB free of 80 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '21 at 13:39
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10940X
CPU0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 80.7
1-Core 143
2-Core 281
91% 168 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 1,059
95% 803 Pts
64-Core 2,387
148% 2,387 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 142
Parallax 132
109% 136 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 137
Splatting 118
101% 124 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$95
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,172
Write 1,469
Mixed 1219
358% 1,620 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 70
246% 88.2 MB/s
DQ Read 978
DQ Write 834
DQ Mixed 1,005
726% 939 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
187GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 112 113 112 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 147
Write 99.2
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 111
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
317GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 114 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 119
Write 111
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 113
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 88%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
29GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 20 13 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 36.9
Write 21.1
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 18.2
32% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.4
227% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 79GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
32767, 8192, 8192, 32767 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 50.7
MC Mixed 33.6
115% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 9.6
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 144 48.9" 1280 720 SAM0F21 C49J89x
Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback