HP Z210 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z210 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1587h
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 14:36
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$175
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 183
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 350
46% 344 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 137
Parallax 126
102% 130 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 130
Splatting 115
98% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SE100S3200G 200GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 515ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 103 106 97 100 100 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.8% Average
Read 209
Write 155
Mixed 202
SusWrite 104
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 25.9
88% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 137
112% 161 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 83%
HX1TBSSDSATA3 1TB
876GB free
Firmware: S1128B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 387 399 399 402 402 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 476
Write 414
Mixed 380
SusWrite 396
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 26.8
113% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 46.1
90% 173 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
403GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 108 109 109 108 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 137
Write 119
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 108
70% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB
186GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 96 94 98 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 79.3
Write 93.4
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 96.2
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 76%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$41
216GB free
Firmware: MK7ONS01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 123 128 124 124 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 125
Write 124
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 126
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 72%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 120 35" 1280 720 BNQ7F46 BenQ XR3501
Typical Z210 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,008 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z210 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback