Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD5  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100311
Uptime35 Days
Run DateJul 24 '21 at 12:07
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$145
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 140
61% 99.2 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 352
34% 281 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460 SE
Gigabyte(1458 350D) 1GB
CLim: 730 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 13
Reflection 20.1
Parallax 12.1
11% 15.1 fps
MRender 19.6
Gravity 13.8
Splatting 12.8
12% 15.4 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$30
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U21010RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 221
Write 156
Mixed 123
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 4.6
34% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 22.6
DQ Write 43
DQ Mixed 10.8
14% 25.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 78%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
158GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 77 77 76 75 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 89.9
Write 98.7
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 74.9
58% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.7% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 15.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.8
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 25.6" 1280 720 HWP26F7 HP LP2475w
Typical GA-X58A-UD5 Builds (Compare 355 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $243
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback