Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardFoxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '21 at 21:13
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 205
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 517
54% 436 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 63.1
Parallax 82.5
0% 48.6 fps
MRender 61.5
Gravity 64.9
Splatting 46.9
46% 57.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41320RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 168 176 160 145 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 455
Write 334
Mixed 267
SusWrite 166
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 27.5
91% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 248
204% 296 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
524GB free
Firmware: JC4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 80 80 79 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 89.2
Write 92.1
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 80.1
60% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 68%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
352GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 189 190 186 190 192 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 183
Mixed 46
SusWrite 189
110% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 109%
Great: 184%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/ KHX1600C9D3/ Samsung M378B5273CH0 Samsung M378B5273CH0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.3% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 45: 7R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
45% 15% 86 329 256 60 23" 1920 1080 DEL4052 Alienware2310
Typical H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $342
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback