Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardFoxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 09:57
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 99%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 180
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 317
28% 239 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 63.1
Parallax 82.4
49% 68.5 fps
MRender 62.8
Gravity 65.2
Splatting 46.2
46% 58.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41320RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 179 123 135 125 167 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 455
Write 323
Mixed 189
SusWrite 151
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 27.7
91% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 216
191% 289 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 101%
XPG GAMMIX S5 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: VC0S032E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 769 755 818 809 812 752 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,207
Write 936
Mixed 940
SusWrite 786
217% 967 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 40.1
152% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 527
DQ Write 619
DQ Mixed 632
460% 593 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 168%
Great: 241%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
524GB free
Firmware: JC4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 96 94 93 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 87.2
Write 87.2
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 94.2
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 68%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
352GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 191 190 191 191 190 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 190
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 190
112% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 111%
Great: 184%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/ KHX1600C9D3/ Samsung M378B5273CH0 Samsung M378B5273CH0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.5% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 15.8
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10.4
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $342
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback