HP Pavilion dv5 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion dv5 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 144E
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101111
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 04 '21 at 15:28
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II P320 Dual-Core
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 31.5
2-Core 56.1
35% 50.6 Pts
4-Core 58.6
8-Core 56.5
8% 57.5 Pts
64-Core 51.6
3% 51.6 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
HP(103C 144E) 336MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.36% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 0.6
0% 0.63 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.1
1% 0.87 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.36%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$80
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 44 51 30 36 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 89.9
Write 36
Mixed 41
SusWrite 42.2
38% 52.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.1
55% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 Ramaxel RMT3020EC58E9F1333 6GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.1% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 7.7
19% 6.73 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.2
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 5 60 14.5" 1280 720 LGD0293
Typical Pavilion dv5 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion dv5 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $48
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback