Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200730
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 07 '21 at 20:42
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 71.2
1-Core 131
2-Core 254
82% 152 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 667
72% 571 Pts
64-Core 654
40% 654 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 8560) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 89
Parallax 8.4
5% 34.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
C500 512GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1128B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 259 10 108 12 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 493
Write 355
Mixed 349
SusWrite 94.7
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 0.3
81% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 71.3
DQ Write 16.9
DQ Mixed 0.4
12% 29.5 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 102%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$32
463GB free
Firmware: D005DEM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 75 70 76 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 76.6
Write 57
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 72.2
45% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GSA16G4SCL196P-26 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.2% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.4
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 10.8
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 75 23.9" 1280 720 SAM707D LF24T35
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback