Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	427% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201021
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 25 '21 at 04:46
Run Duration	259 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$202 128,080 User benchmarks, average bench 98% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Memory 86.8 1-Core 166 2-Core 319 103% 191 Pts	4-Core 611 8-Core 1,078 102% 844 Pts	64-Core 1,524 94% 1,524 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 112%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 1438) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.6% Above average	Lighting 65.3 Reflection 72.5 Parallax 65.3 53% 67.7 fps	MRender 67 Gravity 68.9 Splatting 64.1 54% 66.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB 44,185 User benchmarks, average bench 430% 485GB free (System drive) Firmware: 613000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 4221 2346 1931 1436 1673 1426 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	427% Outstanding	Read 3,182 Write 4,673 Mixed 3,249 SusWrite 2,172 750% 3,319 MB/s	4K Read 78.1 4K Write 212 4K Mixed 101 360% 130 MB/s	DQ Read 1,422 DQ Write 1,098 DQ Mixed 1,225 926% 1,248 MB/s
Poor: 264% ↑ This bench: 427% Great: 573%
Lexar SSD 512GB 1,953 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 161GB free Firmware: H190117H SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 444 444 444 444 423 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 443 Mixed 432 SusWrite 442 102% 453 MB/s	4K Read 42.2 4K Write 88 4K Mixed 49.3 174% 59.8 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 192 145% 194 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 28GB free Firmware: CC1H SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 62 64 63 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 73 Write 73.7 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 63 49% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 70%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113 12,948 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2TB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 102 102 102 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 96.3 Write 102 Mixed 50.4 SusWrite 101 64% 87.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 60%
Maxtor 7L300S0 300GB-$42 337 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 279GB free Firmware: BANC1G10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 60 62 61 61 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	35% Below average	Read 59.5 Write 65.5 Mixed 37 SusWrite 61.3 41% 55.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.9 201% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 35%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 1,445 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 582GB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 117 116 117 117 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	48.5% Average	Read 144 Write 147 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 117 138% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB 9,031 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.4% Good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 21.5 66% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 21.8 59% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 125%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	43.2"	1280 720	PHL08FA PHL BDM4350

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,809 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,643x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,263x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $159Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,412x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,235x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,073x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,467x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,835x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	866x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	770x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $932

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16