Today's hottest deals

MSI Z270 GAMING M5 (MS-7A78)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A78
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING M5 (MS-7A78)  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '21 at 09:58
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$148
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 140
2-Core 283
94% 172 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 742
77% 618 Pts
64-Core 740
46% 740 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
Zotac(19DA 5510) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 162
Parallax 163
134% 163 fps
MRender 195
Gravity 140
Splatting 124
122% 153 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 124%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
875GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 113 109 138 157 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 171
Write 137
Mixed 109
SusWrite 130
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 109%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
125GB free
Firmware: JU000U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 93 91 93 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 136
Write 120
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 91.7
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.6
232% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
410GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 134 134 135 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 133
Write 128
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 134
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C17 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.4% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 3R 6G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 20% 71 310 256 60 24" 1920 1080 CHD0240 GDM-245JN
Typical Z270 GAMING M5 (MS-7A78) Builds (Compare 2,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING M5 (MS-7A78) - $500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $968
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback