PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z220 CMT Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1790 |
Memory | 19.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190610 |
Uptime | 12.6 Days |
Run Date | Aug 28 '21 at 11:09 |
Run Duration | 234 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 26% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1245 V2-$315
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
63.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Transcend TS512GSSD230S 512GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02J0S7JA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 233 229 231 139 112 MB/s
|
88.3%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
759GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 178 175 178 178 178 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
21% | 25% | 36 | 307 | 232 | 60 | 23.5" | 1920 1080 | IVM6146 PL2474H |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 641x |
Xeon E3-1225 V2Intel $200Bench 70%, 2,869 samples | 165x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 111x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 105x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 77x |
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 74x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $381 |