Today's hottest deals

HP Z220 CMT Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z220 CMT Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1790
Memory19.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190610
Uptime12.6 Days
Run DateAug 28 '21 at 11:09
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245 V2-$315
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 73.6
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 163
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 451
46% 370 Pts
64-Core 442
27% 442 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.5% Poor
Lighting 36
Reflection 40.3
Parallax 41.9
29% 39.4 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 36.8
Splatting 27
27% 33.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS512GSSD230S 512GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02J0S7JA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 233 229 231 139 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 478
Write 428
Mixed 402
SusWrite 219
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 42.6
134% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 121
142% 244 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 111%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
759GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 178 175 178 178 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 170
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 176
109% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18KSF51272AZ-1G6K1 Samsung M391B1G73BH0-CK0 18KSF51272AZ-1G6K1 Samsung M391B1G73BH0-CK0 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.4% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 21: 2R 2G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
21% 25% 36 307 232 60 23.5" 1920 1080 IVM6146 PL2474H
History: Score 3: 0R 1G 0B | Score 23: 3R 2G 2B | Score 21: 2R 2G 5B
Typical Z220 CMT Workstation Builds (Compare 1,356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP Z220 CMT Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $381
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback