bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 02 '21 at 09:41
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64% Good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 128
55% 91 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 383
44% 346 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 136GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 111 124 114 122 160 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 393
Write 164
Mixed 226
SusWrite 123
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 12.9
4K Mixed 14.9
61% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 62.8
DQ Write 13.9
DQ Mixed 22.8
21% 33.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 78%
Virtual HD 137GB
118GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 134 156 141 146 225 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 377
Write 390
Mixed 391
SusWrite 155
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 12.7
44% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 63.7
DQ Write 62.2
DQ Mixed 61.8
47% 62.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 67%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 97 86 130 228 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.4% Poor
Read 178
Write 229
Mixed 189
SusWrite 115
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 6.8
24% 7.37 MB/s
DQ Read 64.2
DQ Write 64.5
DQ Mixed 52.7
43% 60.5 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 64GB
null MHz
1024, 32767, 31745 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 46.4
MC Mixed 42.1
109% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.6
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 6 5 0 0" 1280 720
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback