bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
System
MotherboardIntel NUC5i5RYB
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170929
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 19:34
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5250U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 72.2
1-Core 67
2-Core 125
53% 87.9 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 184
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 302 300 300 300 302 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 450
Mixed 397
SusWrite 317
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 47.1
160% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 359
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 104%
Great: 124%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 132 132 132 134 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 86.4
Write 115
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 127
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
164% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 69%
ST3000VN 000-1HJ166 3TB
245GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 161 158 160 159 160 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.2% Above average
Read 132
Write 139
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 160
170% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 62%
WDC WD80 EFBX-68AZZN0 8TB
5.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 160 158 159 159 159 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 182
Write 188
Mixed 134
SusWrite 159
224% 166 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 1.3
261% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
54% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 17.9
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 16.6
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 9 0 0" 1280 720
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback