Gigabyte GA-B250-FinTech-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte B250-FinTech
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B250-FinTech-CF  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '21 at 10:44
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 239
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 468
62% 468 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9400 GT
Asus(1043 82D4) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.9 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJS600M1TC 1TB
916GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 399 340 383 383 389 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 467
Write 384
Mixed 355
SusWrite 382
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 22
124% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 37.4
82% 162 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 11.6
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 13.4
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 45%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B250-FinTech-CF Builds (Compare 427 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B250-FinTech-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback