Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201204
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '21 at 18:35
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	BHR-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$115 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 88.5 1-Core 150 2-Core 187 85% 142 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 368 46% 349 Pts	64-Core 377 23% 377 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 107%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$108 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 410GB free Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 350 327 349 376 345 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 426 Mixed 375 SusWrite 360 93% 413 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 86.1 4K Mixed 42.7 148% 53.5 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 203 152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 121%
Amd-raid WDC WDS100T2G0A- 1TB 2,270 User benchmarks, average bench 115% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: UH510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 3.4 9.7 73 103 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 350 Write 250 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 44.2 132% 182 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 4 449% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 159%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$56 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 548GB free Firmware: AX1E1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 70 71 66 71 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	43.4% Average	Read 80.3 Write 78.2 Mixed 25.4 SusWrite 70.7 46% 63.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.3 80% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB 39,970 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	MC Read 64.2 MC Write 25.5 MC Mixed 40.2 124% 43.3 GB/s	SC Read 27.1 SC Write 26 SC Mixed 36.6 85% 29.9 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 69: 9R 7G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
69%	23%	83	106	4	165	0"	1920 1080

History: Score 72: 8R 8G 8B | Score 69: 9R 7G 3B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,900 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $194

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,659x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $199Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,283x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,423x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,244x
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,081x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,472x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,840x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,107x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	867x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	772x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	728x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,026

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16