Asus M51AC

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Battle cruiser	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	82.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus M51AC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M51AC
Memory	22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130402
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '17 at 00:49
Run Duration	252 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$65 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	76.8% Very good	Memory 88.5 1-Core 105 2-Core 184 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 540 55% 446 Pts	64-Core 544 34% 544 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6171) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.6% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 115 Parallax 96.4 84% 105 fps	MRender 97.6 Gravity 94 Splatting 99.9 80% 97.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 1TB-$270 3,707 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 14631 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 109 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 90 90 210 (AE) Unknown 100 100 55 (B4) Unknown 0 0 10462 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 56 36 274879610924 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 90 90 10 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 46118912289 (F7) Unknown 100 100 1441797856 (F8) Unknown 100 100 1578457492	58.9% Above average	Read 468 Write 153 Mixed 326 69% 316 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 39.7 4K Mixed 14.8 83% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 263 DQ Write 25.9 DQ Mixed 17.8 45% 102 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 104%
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 256GB-$225 3,223 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 48GB free Firmware: HTRAN101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 35644 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 235 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AD) Unknown 182 182 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 84 (C2) HDA temperature 60 50 214750003240 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	106% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 473 Mixed 490 109% 488 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 89.9 4K Mixed 42.9 141% 52.7 MB/s	DQ Read 308 DQ Write 273 DQ Mixed 180 165% 254 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 106%
Hitachi HDN726040ALE614 4TB 4,649 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 3.5TB free Firmware: APGNW7JH Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 108 (03) Spinup time 100 100 30064771072 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 8 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 37 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 8 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 40 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 40 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 171800330278 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	106% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 182 Mixed 176 137% 181 MB/s	4K Read 1.05 4K Write 3.22 4K Mixed 0.44 153% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 113%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 322GB free Firmware: CC54 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 191660088 (03) Spinup time 91 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6622 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 63 60 2446159 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 22631 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 146 (B7) Unknown 56 56 44 (B8) Unknown 93 93 7 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 1 47245362747 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 49 622854180 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 11 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 58 58 85220 (C2) HDA temperature 36 51 98784247844 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 185 1570 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -48142288412399 (F1) Unknown 100 253 10059202177 (F2) Unknown 100 253 22610416285	77.2% Very good	Read 153 Write 116 Mixed 100 92% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.17 63% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 96%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 193GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 72 (03) Spinup time 135 135 21492269351 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3938 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 35667 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 249 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4100 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4100 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 223339806757 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	88.3% Excellent	Read 161 Write 146 Mixed 156 117% 155 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.22 83% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 108%
WD My Passport 2599 2TB 863 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1.5TB free, PID 2599 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 37.4 Write 35.7 Mixed 29.7 43% 34.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.23 73% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56.3% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 16.4 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 18.7 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 69 58% 69 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M51AC Builds (Compare 638 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus M51AC

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	394x
Core i7-4770SIntel $112Bench 71%, 13,157 samples	126x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	43x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	42x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	36x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $84Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	15x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x

RAM
MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GBAdataBench 54%, 2,816 samples	79x
AO2L16BC8R2-BR2S 2x8GBUnknownBench 56%, 671 samples	37x
MI64C1D1629Z1 1x8GBAdataBench 31%, 1,606 samples	36x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $208

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369