Dell XPS 8900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell XPS 8900  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XJ8C4
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201222
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 27 '21 at 01:42
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 81.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 250
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 658
70% 556 Pts
64-Core 638
40% 638 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.5% Poor
Lighting 35.7
Reflection 40.1
Parallax 37.9
29% 37.9 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 26.8
27% 34.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 M.2 2280 256GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT25D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 43 39 45 46 45 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABX0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 177 179 176 180 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 166
Mixed 39
SusWrite 178
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
132% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 108%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 102 105 104 104 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 71
Write 89
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 102
60% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.5
129% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFD8213.16FA11 859B0000802C CT8G4DFD8213.16FA11 Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.2% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 23.5
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 23.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 27" 1280 720 ACR0300 G276HL
Typical XPS 8900 Builds (Compare 2,777 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $379
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback