Today's hottest deals

HP 500-050la

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 500-050la  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ADA
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '21 at 08:22
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 196
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 369
50% 373 Pts
64-Core 379
24% 379 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 2ADA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.29% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.4
3% 2 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.29%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$32
903GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 93 100 89 94 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 107
Write 52.4
Mixed 18
SusWrite 87.5
48% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 62%
Kingston DT 101 G2 8GB
3GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 3.6 6 6.8 6.7 6.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.94% Terrible
Read 16.9
Write 6.5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 5.3
10% 8.68 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
73% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.94%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
31.2% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 10.7
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27.2" 1280 720 HWP3038 HP 27xi
Typical 500-050la Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-050la

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback