Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X399 DESIGNARE EX
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF  (all builds)
Memory59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '21 at 03:01
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2970WX
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 87.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 243
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 765
75% 617 Pts
64-Core 3,398
210% 3,398 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000
Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.56% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 3.3
7% 9.47 fps
MRender 16.3
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 10.6
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.56%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZQLB960HAJR-00007 960GB
808GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDA5202Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1260 1270 1272 1272 1273 1272 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 2,383
Write 1,280
Mixed 1,239
SusWrite 1,270
343% 1,543 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 62.3
212% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 886
DQ Write 604
DQ Mixed 725
547% 738 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 272%
Great: 315%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$103
931GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 909 1736 1729 1734 1732 1729 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 1,999
Write 2,176
Mixed 1,834
SusWrite 1,595
429% 1,901 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 48
197% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 978
DQ Write 527
DQ Mixed 783
574% 762 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 270%
Great: 347%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$103
576GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1888 1739 1731 1740 1728 1734 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 2,004
Write 2,184
Mixed 1,844
SusWrite 1,760
439% 1,948 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 67.5
224% 79.2 MB/s
DQ Read 985
DQ Write 523
DQ Mixed 778
572% 762 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 291%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 44
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 41
122% 42.9 GB/s
SC Read 31.9
SC Write 46.9
SC Mixed 37.4
111% 38.7 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 119%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 60 23.8" 1280 720 AUS24C1 VA249
Typical GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 224 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,463
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback