bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '21 at 01:03
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core
None, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 117
2-Core 230
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 503
61% 468 Pts
64-Core 565
35% 565 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070
Device(0000 0000)
Driver: Ver. 10.0.19041.1
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
44.4% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
36% 40.3 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 158%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 268GB
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 93 93 87 97 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 108
Write 107
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 87.7
67% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.1
183% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 16GB
0, 0 MHz
3072, 13312 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 36.5
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 36.4
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 34: 4R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
34% 16% 75 66 52 64 0" 1920 1080 MSH062E HyperVMonitor
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback