Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '21 at 15:51
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 82.9
1-Core 126
2-Core 249
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 518
68% 509 Pts
64-Core 508
31% 508 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250
Sapphire(174B E269) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
7.54% Terrible
Lighting 9.6
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 13.5
8% 11.2 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 7.9
7% 8.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.54%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme NFP035PCI56-3400 256GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 123 157 123 121 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 544
Write 304
Mixed 428
SusWrite 173
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 23.6
114% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 631
DQ Write 491
DQ Mixed 311
301% 478 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 154%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.7% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 12
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.7
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M M.2 2.0 Builds (Compare 1,541 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $243
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback