bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory16.2 GB free of 40 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121126
Uptime15 Days
Run DateOct 12 '21 at 11:10
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
None, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Memory 35.5
1-Core 29.4
2-Core 55.5
25% 40.1 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 165
17% 137 Pts
64-Core 100
6% 100 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 483GB
167GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 50 51 45 34 9.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Microsoft Virtual Disk 216GB
188GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 45 50 42 31 9.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 902
Write 645
Mixed 1,009
648% 852 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 3.5
960% 6.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 40GB
null MHz
3968, 32767, 4225 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
66.9% Good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 25.6
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.9
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 224
18% 224 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback