Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H310M DS2 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M DS2 2.0  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190308
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateOct 13 '21 at 21:44
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$225
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 66.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 265
79% 149 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 680
68% 555 Pts
64-Core 907
56% 907 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
63.5% Good
Lighting 84.4
Reflection 113
Parallax 71.2
69% 89.5 fps
MRender 60.7
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 64.8
53% 65.1 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingFast 960GB
740GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQKA.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 389 401 420 422 418 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 399
Write 366
Mixed 350
SusWrite 394
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 33.2
126% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 201
176% 259 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM2666HLB-16G 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.3% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 12.5
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 11.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 109
36% 109 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M DS2 2.0 Builds (Compare 966 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M DS2 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $260
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback