Acer Aspire TC-780A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-780A  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-780A(KBL)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170526
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 19 '21 at 08:16
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 210
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 413
55% 414 Pts
64-Core 413
26% 413 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2047 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Lighting 70.8
Reflection 78.9
Parallax 69.9
58% 73.2 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 71.8
Splatting 72
58% 70.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SBXe 240GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM00E2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 20 126 55 96 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 356
Write 304
Mixed 280
SusWrite 98.6
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 36.4
145% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 422
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 67.1
122% 246 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 219%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
394GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 143 144 141 137 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 124
Write 119
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 138
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2P24HC8T1-BUSS 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.1% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 10.3
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.7
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-780A Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-780A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback