Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191101
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 21 '21 at 12:32
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9500
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 135
2-Core 265
87% 160 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 470
61% 460 Pts
64-Core 491
30% 491 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 90%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Disco virtuale Microsoft 136GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 31 42 55 88 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 43% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 8GB
0, 0 MHz
3968, 4224 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
56.8% Above average
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 16.4
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback