Asrock Z590 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics36.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsrock Z590 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 23 '21 at 20:46
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-11600K-$220
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 83.6
1-Core 184
2-Core 360
113% 209 Pts
4-Core 694
8-Core 1,096
114% 895 Pts
64-Core 1,296
87% 1,296 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2825) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.7% Below average
Lighting 40.8
Reflection 38
Parallax 52.8
33% 43.9 fps
MRender 54.6
Gravity 50.2
Splatting 39.9
41% 48.2 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 39%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 479 478 484 396 293 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 460
Mixed 407
SusWrite 435
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 58.9
202% 73.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 343
259% 347 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 125%
Great: 131%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$80
214GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 126 123 124 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 149
Write 149
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 123
80% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 109%
Toshiba HDWR440 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0601
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 239 241 240 241 240 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 233
Write 227
Mixed 114
SusWrite 240
149% 203 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.8
198% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 136%
Great: 139%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
59GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 70 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 77.2
Write 80.7
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 69.4
51% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 51%
SanDisk Cruzer 16GB
14GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.9 6 5.9 5.9 5.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
6.89% Terrible
Read 26.6
Write 3.5
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 5.8
9% 9.65 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
28% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.89%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$77
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.6% Good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 16.4
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 19.9
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 24: 3R 3G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 12% 49 311 229 60 24.1" 1920 1200 HWP2676 HP LP2465
History: Score 27: 3R 4G 0B | Score 24: 3R 3G 0B
Typical Z590 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 448 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z590 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $803
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $300Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11400F $196Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback