Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 77% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210326
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateOct 24 '21 at 15:05
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU 21%
CPU Throttled 77%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10310U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 72.5
1-Core 125
2-Core 253
81% 150 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 506
58% 451 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.91% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 7.2
5% 5.87 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 10.8
7% 8.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.91%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD HEORIADY HX-001 E 512G 512GB
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2105XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 334 339 314 325 322 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 342
Write 301
Mixed 288
SusWrite 317
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 22.9
91% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 16.7
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 35.9
36% 55.3 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 269%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
44% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 12
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 14.4
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 95.7
42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,852 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback