Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK  (all builds)
MotherboardCasper Casper Nirvana Notebook
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '21 at 12:01
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
30% Poor
Memory 36.5
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 101
43% 74.6 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 61.1
16% 106 Pts
64-Core 44.3
3% 44.3 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 999C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.45% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 6
Parallax 1.3
0% 2.63 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 3.9
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.45%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 240G 240GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN4763
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 26 17 15 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 418
Write 15
Mixed 24
SusWrite 23.2
25% 120 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 13.3
4K Mixed 12.6
57% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 14.4
DQ Mixed 18.2
28% 57.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64C8HG0NS-CG 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.2% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 11.6
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 7
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 219
18% 219 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NOTEBOOK Builds (Compare 2,359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback