Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory22.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170921
Uptime10.9 Days
Run DateNov 08 '21 at 18:53
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 68.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 244
75% 140 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 970
86% 726 Pts
64-Core 2,430
150% 2,430 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Asus(1043 85EC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 178
Parallax 159
113% 159 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 159
Splatting 118
106% 131 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 318 315 278 272 301 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,696
Write 414
Mixed 593
SusWrite 315
164% 754 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 59.7
203% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 977
DQ Write 593
DQ Mixed 744
566% 772 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 185%
Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
336GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 464 462 435 436 472 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 415
Mixed 406
SusWrite 443
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 50.6
161% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 113%
Great: 134%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
416GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 112 114 112 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 107
Write 106
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 112
71% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 87%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
86GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 111 105 107 108 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 87.3
Write 85.2
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 107
63% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 87%
Generic MassStorageClass 248GB
118GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 85 85 81 79 86 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.2% Average
Read 90.5
Write 6.2
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 76.7
54% 47 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 2.3
237% 5.23 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 43%
JetFlash Transcend 64GB
25GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 18 15 19 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 120
Write 15.8
Mixed 17.8
SusWrite 19.6
41% 43.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Mixed 1.1
91% 3.65 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 56
MC Write 51.1
MC Mixed 56.2
156% 54.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 39.6
SC Mixed 20.6
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 137%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $29

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $834
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback