Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N4200 10,928 User benchmarks, average bench 30% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	31.9% Below average	Memory 40.3 1-Core 47 2-Core 90.4 34% 59.2 Pts	4-Core 137 8-Core 137 18% 137 Pts	64-Core 126 8% 126 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505 2,850 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 07B3) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	1.93% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 2.1 2% 2.47 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 2 Splatting 2.4 2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.93% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKF128G8 SATA 128GB 3,771 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: LHFD04N SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 78 90 103 115 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	46% Average	Read 292 Write 74.3 Mixed 164 SusWrite 83.2 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 32.3 4K Mixed 24.1 72% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 62.8 69% 118 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
0 4x2GB 142 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 8.1 22% 7.57 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.07 GB/s	Latency 201 20% 201 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples	136x
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	14x

GPU
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	102x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	34x
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	11x

SSD
hynix SC311 SATA 128GBSKBench 65%, 20,313 samples	31x
X400 M.2 2280 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 12,357 samples	26x
SSDSCKKF128G8 SATA 128GBIntelBench 65%, 3,771 samples	23x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16