Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 5350 APU R3 3,720 User benchmarks, average bench 34% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.05 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	39% Below average	Memory 57.2 1-Core 32.2 2-Core 64 34% 51.1 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 127 16% 124 Pts	64-Core 126 8% 126 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3 11,968 User benchmarks, average bench 2% MSI(1462 7865) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.152.0.0 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	1.72% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 3.6 Parallax 1.6 2% 2.37 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 2.9 2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.72% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 120GB 1,888 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 23 53 81 89 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 319 Write 335 Mixed 286 SusWrite 77.7 57% 255 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 55.4 4K Mixed 7.5 71% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 61.9 DQ Mixed 74.7 62% 91.5 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-009.A00LF 9905402-661.A00G 8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.5% Very poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 6.9 19% 6.53 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 6.6 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 136 29% 136 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 5350 APU R3AMDBench 34%, 3,720 samples	32x
Athlon 5150 APU R3AMDBench 32%, 1,478 samples	7x
Sempron 3850 APU R3AMDBench 30%, 515 samples	6x

RAM
CT102464BD160B.M16 CT102464BD160B.M16 16GBUnknownBench 36%, 304 samples	3x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	3x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	3x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16