Gigabyte GA-H310M H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M H  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '21 at 22:48
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 246
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 740
77% 617 Pts
64-Core 739
46% 739 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
865GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 122 119 120 116 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 139
Write 140
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 116
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 107%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 99 98 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 82.5
Write 108
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 102
134% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.6
134% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IM48GU88N24-FFFHAM 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.7% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 11.7
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 13.1
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 56.8
70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M H Builds (Compare 1,766 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $201
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback