| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 69% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색 |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20171212 |
| Uptime | 2.2 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 15 '21 at 11:54 |
| Run Duration | 167 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 80% |
PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
75.3%
Very good
|
74% 131 Pts
|
54% 403 Pts
|
25% 404 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
|
57.6%
Above average
|
58% 71.3 fps
|
56% 68.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 62 65 53 59 55 MB/s
|
69%
Good
|
39% 177 MB/s
|
128% 45.3 MB/s
|
124% 194 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
347GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 130 131 131 131 133 MB/s
|
82.9%
Excellent
|
96% 131 MB/s
|
238% 1.73 MB/s
| |
|
LG U+ TAP3 1TB
181GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
|
20.9%
Poor
|
52% 38.6 MB/s
|
94% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
72.1%
Very good
|
77% 26.9 GB/s
|
47% 16.3 GB/s
|
50% 79.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 5,929 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-K
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 1,117x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 641x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 554x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 843x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 470x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 368x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $182 |