Today's hottest deals

Asus Z97-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-K  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150520
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 16 '21 at 09:04
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 186
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 368
49% 368 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 4870
Asus(1043 031E) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 9
12% 13.6 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 8.5
8% 10.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
262GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 349 349 348 348 339 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 346
Mixed 291
SusWrite 347
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 94.7
4K Mixed 40.9
149% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 107
149% 274 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 101%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
395GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 115 115 113 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 101
Write 89.6
Mixed 69
SusWrite 114
69% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273EBO-CKO 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.5% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 18.1
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 19.3
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-K Builds (Compare 3,168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-K - $147

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $795
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback