Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus WS-C621E-SAGE Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840x2160x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '21 at 00:05
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Bronze 3104
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 38.6
1-Core 55.4
2-Core 101
37% 65.1 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 431
38% 324 Pts
64-Core 649
40% 649 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Gigabyte(1458 376A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 194
Parallax 185
131% 180 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 186
Splatting 133
124% 153 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 512G 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: 40101000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 359 386 404 405 404 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 441
Mixed 380
SusWrite 388
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 37.1
126% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 271
228% 330 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 119%
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31
447GB free
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 357 237 176 174 173 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 477
Write 450
Mixed 360
SusWrite 238
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 30.8
114% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 198
191% 300 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 101%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
881GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1666 1683 1676 1680 1676 1677 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 1,610
Write 1,651
Mixed 1,537
SusWrite 1,676
366% 1,619 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 57.4
191% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 568
DQ Write 415
DQ Mixed 507
375% 497 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 248%
Great: 477%
Hitachi HDN721010ALE604 10TB
9.5TB free
Firmware: 83XN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 241 236 235 234 225 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 226
Mixed 108
SusWrite 232
143% 196 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.2
321% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 129%
Great: 135%
Hitachi HDN721010ALE604 10TB
9.5TB free
Firmware: 83XN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 243 240 224 234 236 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 211
Write 212
Mixed 98
SusWrite 236
138% 189 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.1
321% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 128%
Great: 135%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB
23GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 20.2
Mixed 23
SusWrite 20.8
32% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.4
125% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40CB2-CTD 1x31GB
1 of 12 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.5% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 6.1
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 209
19% 209 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS-C621E-SAGE Series Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO

System: Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $1,240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback