Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime2 Days
Run DateNov 23 '21 at 21:47
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$98
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 199
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 584
54% 454 Pts
64-Core 584
36% 584 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70%
Great: 78%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 64MB
Ram: 64MB, Driver: 21.30.23.01
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 30.9
16% 22.3 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 24.3
Splatting 15.7
14% 17.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 18%
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.1% Above average
Lighting 63.3
Reflection 69.7
Parallax 65.8
52% 66.3 fps
MRender 65.2
Gravity 66.5
Splatting 63.1
53% 64.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD NTC 240GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1128B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 93 57 2.9 6.2 8.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 415
Write 341
Mixed 317
SusWrite 28.4
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 0.1
39% 10 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
87GB free
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 105 106 107 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 172
Write 152
Mixed 99.6
SusWrite 107
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.2
229% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JHD3000U1908JG 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.8% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 26.3
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 32.9
SC Mixed 25.1
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,746 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $401
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback