Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST X99-RS9
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 30 '22 at 01:13
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 147
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 506
46% 388 Pts
64-Core 882
55% 882 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.8% Average
Lighting 56.3
Reflection 63
Parallax 56.7
46% 58.7 fps
MRender 63.3
Gravity 56.9
Splatting 49.4
46% 56.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS250G 250GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK9NO2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 890
Write 1,103
Mixed 943
220% 979 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 50.4
166% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 555
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 477
346% 455 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 211%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
317GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 116 116 115 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 114
Write 110
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 116
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JHD3000U1908JG 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.7% Above average
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 17.2
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 13.5
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,838 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback