Kogan KAL15Q300HA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemKogan KAL15Q300HA  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201022
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 25 '21 at 07:45
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 195
66% 121 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 120
26% 174 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9684
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
3.65% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 7
6% 7.3 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.65%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
W800s 128GB SSD 128GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0722A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 49 45 3.1 28 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 400
Write 256
Mixed 273
SusWrite 39.7
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 14
66% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 1
42% 101 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 2533 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.8% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 21.4
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 17.5
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KAL15Q300HA Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Kogan KAL15Q300HA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback