GPU GWNC31514

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGPU GWNC31514  (all builds)
MotherboardGPU GPU Company
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210928
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '22 at 23:30
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 66.7
1-Core 132
2-Core 203
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 316
43% 320 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1C6C 078B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
9.86% Terrible
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 11.5
9% 12.6 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 14.4
Splatting 11.7
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.86%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
W800s 128GB SSD 128GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09124
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 311 306 336 321 277 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 424
Write 383
Mixed 368
SusWrite 311
84% 371 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 28.1
98% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 189
150% 205 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 8 slots used
4GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 16.5
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 109
36% 109 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GWNC31514 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: GPU GWNC31514

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback