Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive84.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8299
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '21 at 19:01
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$90
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 209
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 403
54% 404 Pts
64-Core 405
25% 405 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 550X
Device(1B0A 90FC) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.21020.5007
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 26.9
Parallax 20.8
12% 20.9 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 15.7
Splatting 20
16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK512TBN-1AR15ABHA 512GB
310GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC0T12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 394 324 252 253 256 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 384
Write 390
Mixed 337
SusWrite 313
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 33.2
117% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 292
223% 301 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC - [0x9E02] CMK8GX4M2A2400C14 M378A5244CB0-CRC - [0x9E02] CMK8GX4M2A2400C14 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.7% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 23.9
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 21.9
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF Builds (Compare 1,890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback