Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8299
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '22 at 21:26
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$90
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 209
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 413
55% 413 Pts
64-Core 413
26% 413 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Device(1B0A 90FC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 27
Parallax 20.7
12% 20.9 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 15.6
Splatting 20
16% 20.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK512TBN-1AR15ABHA 512GB
304GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC0T12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 391 327 257 257 251 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 343
Write 250
Mixed 333
SusWrite 313
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 80.7
4K Mixed 35.7
118% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 288
218% 293 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC - [0x9E02] CMK8GX4M2A2400C14 M378A5244CB0-CRC - [0x9E02] CMK8GX4M2A2400C14 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.8% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 24.2
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 20.7
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF Builds (Compare 1,890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G3 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback