MSI A320M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7B38)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B38
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7B38)  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '21 at 11:21
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 67.2
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 184
65% 115 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 528
52% 424 Pts
64-Core 529
33% 529 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.33
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
8.58% Terrible
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 2.7
8% 9.2 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 10
Splatting 9.5
9% 11 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 8.58%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$20
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 61 62 62 60 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 462
Write 199
Mixed 329
SusWrite 73.8
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 29.7
131% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 179
160% 239 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 87%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
11GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 9.6 11 11 9.4 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
6.95% Terrible
Read 22.1
Write 3.5
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 9.8
12% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.95%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD48G240081 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
47.1% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.8
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7B38) Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7B38)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback