Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Gold G6400 3,112 User benchmarks, average bench 68% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	66.3% Good	Memory 77.6 1-Core 120 2-Core 213 77% 137 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 330 43% 323 Pts	64-Core 319 20% 319 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610 3,619 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Biostar(1565 3116) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9127 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	2.73% Terrible	Lighting 3.2 Reflection 4 Parallax 0.2 3% 2.47 fps	MRender 7 Gravity 5.4 Splatting 0.1 3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.73% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V-gen09sm21ar256sdkm2 256GB 256GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0503A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 94 62 87 68 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	47% Average	Read 387 Write 240 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 81.9 40% 182 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 21.8 4K Mixed 6.5 63% 18.9 MB/s	DQ Read 161 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 0.3 56% 134 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 477GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 162 175 175 175 176 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	99.4% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 162 Mixed 90.1 SusWrite 169 110% 150 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 56 1x16GB 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.7% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 13.4 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 13 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 85 47% 85 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	143x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 37,718 samples	72x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	70x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	47x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	28x
Burst 240GBPatriotBench 73%, 26,886 samples	24x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	21x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	15x

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $253